Apr 25, 2006 00:26
Banning for farming trees
Jhood wants to ban Cool Fool from the chat channel #winbolo for farming trees before "GO".
Well, he says he gave CF a warning, and if CF doesn't stop doing it, then it will escalate until a ban. So he is starting the process that will lead up to a ban if CF refuses to obey Jhood's request.
So what do you think? We've never banned anyone from #winbolo for the 3 years that winbolo.us policy has been in operation for the act of farming trees before go.
I feel there are different ways to enforce the way to rules we've set up such as:
1) Public outcry and refusal to play such game with such ppl
2) Public shame such as being caught on log viewer and having ppl pointed it out and then having the bad reputation of a cheater.
3) Peer Pressure
4) Banning from #winbolo
5) Banning from game server
It seems to me in this case #1 and #2 would be more efficient.
I personally would rather see #4 used for extreme cases and as little as possible since it doesn't keep ppl from actually playing the standard pw games, but simply keeps em out of the chat channel. I think of it as the principle of "You ruin pw games badly, so we kick you out so you can't get the custom pw we set up to prevent you from joining our game".
In CF's case I think if ppl are really upset with it, I would think they can start a game and ask him not to join. Then if he joins despite their wishes, then yes he should be banned. I've used that principle with other players instead of starting the process of kick-banning them.
However, in this case, except for a quick message from Jhood to CF, nobody protested and we ended up playing a very enjoyable game. Enjoyable and interesting enought that Jhood and I analyzed it and watched the log afterward. So, in this situation, CF's farming didn't ruin the game and didn't prevent us from having a great game.
What do you think? Should we start banning from #winbolo every slight rule offense done in a pw game? Or should we reserve the banning from #winbolo only the big offense - the game wreakers like starting before go and refusing to leave?
I might be wrong in my thinking, hence why I am interested in other people's argument and logic. Afterall, rules can only be effective if they are something most people agree with.
Well, he says he gave CF a warning, and if CF doesn't stop doing it, then it will escalate until a ban. So he is starting the process that will lead up to a ban if CF refuses to obey Jhood's request.
So what do you think? We've never banned anyone from #winbolo for the 3 years that winbolo.us policy has been in operation for the act of farming trees before go.
I feel there are different ways to enforce the way to rules we've set up such as:
1) Public outcry and refusal to play such game with such ppl
2) Public shame such as being caught on log viewer and having ppl pointed it out and then having the bad reputation of a cheater.
3) Peer Pressure
4) Banning from #winbolo
5) Banning from game server
It seems to me in this case #1 and #2 would be more efficient.
I personally would rather see #4 used for extreme cases and as little as possible since it doesn't keep ppl from actually playing the standard pw games, but simply keeps em out of the chat channel. I think of it as the principle of "You ruin pw games badly, so we kick you out so you can't get the custom pw we set up to prevent you from joining our game".
In CF's case I think if ppl are really upset with it, I would think they can start a game and ask him not to join. Then if he joins despite their wishes, then yes he should be banned. I've used that principle with other players instead of starting the process of kick-banning them.
However, in this case, except for a quick message from Jhood to CF, nobody protested and we ended up playing a very enjoyable game. Enjoyable and interesting enought that Jhood and I analyzed it and watched the log afterward. So, in this situation, CF's farming didn't ruin the game and didn't prevent us from having a great game.
What do you think? Should we start banning from #winbolo every slight rule offense done in a pw game? Or should we reserve the banning from #winbolo only the big offense - the game wreakers like starting before go and refusing to leave?
I might be wrong in my thinking, hence why I am interested in other people's argument and logic. Afterall, rules can only be effective if they are something most people agree with.