Strange bolo occurances...

This topic is locked
Nov 01, 2005 02:38 Strange bolo occurances...
Some strange things have been happening with bolo. I was playing a game when my connection started to lag. The lag was so bad that everything would freeze, except my tank, and I would be able to move about and shoot things for a few seconds… and then it would say “network failed” and then everything that happened in those few seconds would happened and I would be frozen- but unable to die until I reconnected. That only happened during that one game though, so I’m not really worried about it, however…


Another strange thing I saw during the same game was an invisible tank. I saw it shoot a pill and do damage to it…I even saw it get killed and the flame/explosion that resulted from it. And then I started getting messages from someone (too defamatory to post) — and this is the strangest part—from a “???” but there was no such player in the players tab. And then I asked the other players if they were getting any messages from a “???” and they said they weren’t.

Weird, huh?

I don’t think these are technical problems since it has happened only once…


Post whatever odd experiences you might have had too.
Nov 01, 2005 02:44
I noticed that my own connection was unusually slow for a Monday. I don't know if this is related to Halloween; it seems unlikely to me, but I can't think of anything else.
Nov 02, 2005 00:35
Stand-by. Yupp we have a cheater on our hands, lets b4n h1m
Nov 02, 2005 01:09
Acro wrote:
I noticed that my own connection was unusually slow for a Monday. I don't know if this is related to Halloween; it seems unlikely to me, but I can't think of anything else.


Your connection probably got TP'ed.
Nov 02, 2005 01:14
I got 9 pounds of candy this Halloween.
Nov 02, 2005 01:41
Be sure to come back when we give a damn.
Nov 02, 2005 01:47
Shit, I should have put in a non-flame message.

*THIS IS NOT A FLAME*
Nov 02, 2005 01:49
And I should've made it clear that either way, I'll speak my mind.
Nov 02, 2005 02:16
and I'm sure its clear by now that dantheman is a flaming idiot.

Min
Nov 02, 2005 02:17
Min wrote:
and I'm sure its clear by now that dantheman is a flaming idiot.

Min


I'm sure its clear by now that your a complete absolute hypocrite.

And just for the reference, you've commited a fallacy.
Nov 02, 2005 03:21
Because yelling at Min for locking threads and then turning around and crapping on the forum and the channel is a virtue that even Jesus would be envious of.
Nov 02, 2005 03:47
*Quietly roasts a marshmallow over a jumping jack while shooting a roman candle at DTM and Nova as they duke it out.*
Nov 02, 2005 03:49
*Throws the stupid rock he got at them*


*Throws the stupid rocket he got at them*
Nov 02, 2005 04:19
DANTHEMAN! wrote:
I'm sure its clear by now that your a complete absolute hypocrite.


Well; let’s see. A hypocrite is someone who professes beliefs and opinions that they don't actually hold ...... do explain when I've done this.

DANTHEMAN! wrote:
And just for the reference, you've commited a fallacy.


Here we go again; dantheman is using big words that he doesn't fully understand. Lets see what the dictionary has to say. Fallacy - "A statement or an argument based on a false or invalid inference." The statement that you’re a flaming idiot is based on the proof you've provided on this web forum, simply do a search for all posts by dantheman, read them through, and you'll recognize it just as everyone else has.

Min
Nov 02, 2005 05:36
Pwnt via Min's ability to be articulate
Nov 02, 2005 20:41
Min wrote:
DANTHEMAN! wrote:
I'm sure its clear by now that your a complete absolute hypocrite.


Well; let’s see. A hypocrite is someone who professes beliefs and opinions that they don't actually hold ...... do explain when I've done this.

DANTHEMAN! wrote:
And just for the reference, you've commited a fallacy.


Here we go again; dantheman is using big words that he doesn't fully understand. Lets see what the dictionary has to say. Fallacy - "A statement or an argument based on a false or invalid inference." The statement that you’re a flaming idiot is based on the proof you've provided on this web forum, simply do a search for all posts by dantheman, read them through, and you'll recognize it just as everyone else has.

Min

Min. You call me a flamer, when everybody on this forum can agree that you are a flamer yourself. That is where I was calling you a hypocrite.

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=fallacy

As for the fallacy, you use only one definition, while there are many more out there. That act, in itself, is a fallacy: slanting.
As for the fallacy that YOU committed, you responded to me, instead of to my statement. You gave no evidence of me being a "flaming idiot" and made no statement contradicting that. Instead, you called me a "flaming idiot" without giving any supporting evidence. Coming to a conclusion with too few facts. That is a fallacy.

Now while we are on the subject of fallacies, I'd like to point out one which you committed. You say that I have no idea what the word "fallacy" means, yet you have no evidence to support that. What value does that statement have? None. It is an illogical statement.
Nov 02, 2005 22:48
Wow, just wow, I had intended to write some sort of real response to this idiocy, however I decided that after this display, you probably wouldn't understand a word of it anyways.

Let’s make a short list. Misuse of hypocrite, again. You’ve misinterpreted fallacy; again. Do you even know what ‘slanting’ is?, cause if we want to use dantheman logic on it, your discussing slope of a line or plane that goes in a direction other than perpendicular. Sure there is another definition, but we wouldn’t want to appeal to a certain audience.

Gods you’re a idiot, and you’ve proven it once again with this pile of stupidity. Don’t bother responding without the assistance of your English teacher.

Min

p.s. you've also completely misunderstood the term 'flaming idiot' which actually isn't referencing your ability to flame at all, since you can't.

DANTHEMAN! wrote:

Min. You call me a flamer, when everybody on this forum can agree that you are a flamer yourself. That is where I was calling you a hypocrite.

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=fallacy

As for the fallacy, you use only one definition, while there are many more out there. That act, in itself, is a fallacy: slanting.
As for the fallacy that YOU committed, you responded to me, instead of to my statement. You gave no evidence of me being a "flaming idiot" and made no statement contradicting that. Instead, you called me a "flaming idiot" without giving any supporting evidence. Coming to a conclusion with too few facts. That is a fallacy.

Now while we are on the subject of fallacies, I'd like to point out one which you committed. You say that I have no idea what the word "fallacy" means, yet you have no evidence to support that. What value does that statement have? None. It is an illogical statement.
Nov 02, 2005 22:53
Min wrote:
Wow, just wow, I had intended to write some sort of real response to this idiocy, however I decided that after this display, you probably wouldn't understand a word of it anyways.

Let’s make a short list. Misuse of hypocrite, again. You’ve misinterpreted fallacy; again. Do you even know what ‘slanting’ is?, cause if we want to use dantheman logic on it, your discussing slope of a line or plane that goes in a direction other than perpendicular. Sure there is another definition, but we wouldn’t want to appeal to a certain audience.

Gods you’re a idiot, and you’ve proven it once again with this pile of stupidity. Don’t bother responding without the assistance of your English teacher.

Min

p.s. you've also completely misunderstood the term 'flaming idiot' which actually isn't referencing your ability to flame at all, since you can't.

DANTHEMAN! wrote:

Min. You call me a flamer, when everybody on this forum can agree that you are a flamer yourself. That is where I was calling you a hypocrite.

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=fallacy

As for the fallacy, you use only one definition, while there are many more out there. That act, in itself, is a fallacy: slanting.
As for the fallacy that YOU committed, you responded to me, instead of to my statement. You gave no evidence of me being a "flaming idiot" and made no statement contradicting that. Instead, you called me a "flaming idiot" without giving any supporting evidence. Coming to a conclusion with too few facts. That is a fallacy.

Now while we are on the subject of fallacies, I'd like to point out one which you committed. You say that I have no idea what the word "fallacy" means, yet you have no evidence to support that. What value does that statement have? None. It is an illogical statement.


Now, now. You have absolutely NO WAY to come up with a proper arguement here. So you decide to post that shit. Again, you've committed a fallacy. I'm sorry Min, but in order to make a proper arguement you need to specifiy what is wrong with mine. Go back to elementary school.
Nov 02, 2005 22:56
DANTHEMAN! wrote:

Now, now. You have absolutely NO WAY to come up with a proper arguement here. So you decide to post that shit. Again, you've committed a fallacy. I'm sorry Min, but in order to make a proper arguement you need to specifiy what is wrong with mine. Go back to elementary school.


I did already, you have no english comprehension skills, why should I waste time trying to educate you?

Min
Nov 02, 2005 22:58
Min wrote:
DANTHEMAN! wrote:

Now, now. You have absolutely NO WAY to come up with a proper arguement here. So you decide to post that shit. Again, you've committed a fallacy. I'm sorry Min, but in order to make a proper arguement you need to specifiy what is wrong with mine. Go back to elementary school.


I did already, you have no english comprehension skills, why should I waste time trying to educate you?

Min


Again, a fallacy.
Nov 02, 2005 23:00
DANTHEMAN! wrote:
Again, a fallacy.


Again incorrect useage of a word.

Min
Nov 02, 2005 23:20
Pffff.......... :(

All these lines are useless and annoying !
Nov 02, 2005 23:28
Alain your usless and annoying :D

terminator
Nov 02, 2005 23:30
That's funny, coming from jaime. I also like how Dan is shifting all the blame to Min with logic so frail George Bush wouldn't touch it. Keep on truckin'.
Nov 02, 2005 23:35
Nova wrote:
That's funny, coming from jaime. I also like how Dan is shifting all the blame to Min with logic so frail George Bush wouldn't touch it. Keep on truckin'.


Another fallacy.
1 2 3 Next »
Page 1 of 3 (74 posts total)