Strange bolo occurances...

This topic is locked

Nov 02, 2005 23:54

I like how you're saying "OMG THATZ NOT A PROPER ARGUMENT" when I've hardly laid claim to that. If you weren't so hell-bent on missing the point maybe I'd make the effort to back myself up here, but I'm dropping all pretenses of doing anything for your benefit. Learn how to read, learn to open your fucking mind or don't even bother.

Nov 03, 2005 00:11

Nova wrote:
I like how you're saying "OMG THATZ NOT A PROPER ARGUMENT" when I've hardly laid claim to that. If you weren't so hell-bent on missing the point maybe I'd make the effort to back myself up here, but I'm dropping all pretenses of doing anything for your benefit. Learn how to read, learn to open your fucking mind or don't even bother.

Here we have a perfect example of a fallacy. Absolutely perfect. If I wasn't so lazy, I would go fetch the proper name for this type of fallacy.

Nov 03, 2005 00:12

jaime wrote:
Alain your usless and annoying :D

terminator

jaime, you're the best ! lol :D

Nov 03, 2005 00:21

:roll:

Nov 03, 2005 01:01

DANTHEMAN! wrote:
Nova wrote:
I like how you're saying "OMG THATZ NOT A PROPER ARGUMENT" when I've hardly laid claim to that. If you weren't so hell-bent on missing the point maybe I'd make the effort to back myself up here, but I'm dropping all pretenses of doing anything for your benefit. Learn how to read, learn to open your fucking mind or don't even bother.

Here we have a perfect example of a fallacy. Absolutely perfect. If I wasn't so lazy, I would go fetch the proper name for this type of fallacy.

Fuck DTM. Just cuz you learned a new word in English (Wait maybe it's still called Language Arts for you) doesnt mean you have to try and apply it to every situation. Nova didnt make any claims to you not making a proper arguement. He just said your logic was frail. Which it is. Because they arent so much using fallacies as they're using there own inferences from statements you've made to arrive at the conclusion which we've all arrived at. You're a bloody idiot. So shut up. Please.

Nov 03, 2005 01:04

nobody wrote:
DANTHEMAN! wrote:
Nova wrote:
I like how you're saying "OMG THATZ NOT A PROPER ARGUMENT" when I've hardly laid claim to that. If you weren't so hell-bent on missing the point maybe I'd make the effort to back myself up here, but I'm dropping all pretenses of doing anything for your benefit. Learn how to read, learn to open your fucking mind or don't even bother.

Here we have a perfect example of a fallacy. Absolutely perfect. If I wasn't so lazy, I would go fetch the proper name for this type of fallacy.

Fuck DTM. Just cuz you learned a new word in English (Wait maybe it's still called Language Arts for you) doesnt mean you have to try and apply it to every situation. Nova didnt make any claims to you not making a proper arguement. He just said your logic was frail. Which it is. Because they arent so much using fallacies as they're using there own inferences from statements you've made to arrive at the conclusion which we've all arrived at. You're a bloody idiot. So shut up. Please.

Apparently you have have absolutely no understanding of how to make a proper arguement, or what a fallacy is.

Nov 03, 2005 01:04

Note my use of sentence fragments, run on sentences, and slang words such as "cuz" to make up my post. In case you learned any of those recently in L.A.

Nov 03, 2005 01:11

DANTHEMAN! wrote:
Apparently you have have absolutely no understanding of how to make a proper arguement, or what a fallacy is.

Ok, so here's your arguement put against you. Your statement is a fallacy. You're assuming i don't know what a fallacy because you think i used it incorrectly. But i do know what one is. And as for a proper arguement. Any arguement is a proper one. Hey look you said something, i said somethign opposite to what you said even though it makes no sense. Its an aruguement no matter how stupid the reasoning is for either side, its still an arguement.

Nov 03, 2005 01:13

I looked at your post, realized that you had no fucking idea of what a fallacy is, so therefore I am NOT assuming that you don't have a good idea of what a fallacy is.

Nov 03, 2005 01:16

How many times do you have to prove yourself wrong before you get the picture?

Nov 03, 2005 01:19

nobody wrote:
How many times do you have to prove yourself wrong before you get the picture?

Where's your evidence that I'm wrong?

Nov 03, 2005 01:21

Ok, what was your arguement against Min and Nova, regarding fallcies. They took posts of yours, and made an assumption. What did you do? You took a post of mine, and made an assumption. You called their assumptions fallacies...and yet yours a concrete truth?

Nov 03, 2005 01:26

nobody wrote:
DANTHEMAN! wrote:
Nova wrote:
I like how you're saying "OMG THATZ NOT A PROPER ARGUMENT" when I've hardly laid claim to that. If you weren't so hell-bent on missing the point maybe I'd make the effort to back myself up here, but I'm dropping all pretenses of doing anything for your benefit. Learn how to read, learn to open your fucking mind or don't even bother.

Here we have a perfect example of a fallacy. Absolutely perfect. If I wasn't so lazy, I would go fetch the proper name for this type of fallacy.

Fuck DTM. Just cuz you learned a new word in English (Wait maybe it's still called Language Arts for you) doesnt mean you have to try and apply it to every situation. Nova didnt make any claims to you not making a proper arguement. He just said your logic was frail. Which it is. Because they arent so much using fallacies as they're using there own inferences from statements you've made to arrive at the conclusion which we've all arrived at. You're a bloody idiot. So shut up. Please.

Lets look at this again.

"Nova didnt make any claims to you not making a proper arguement. He just said your logic was frail."-Nobody

Here we have the concrete evidence which you asked for. A fallacy is an illogical statement or arguement. So when he says my logic is frail, it is the exact same idea. Therefore, I have the concrete evidence that you do not understand what a fallacy is.

Nov 03, 2005 01:31

DANTHEMAN! wrote:
Here we have the concrete evidence which you asked for. A fallacy is an illogical statement or arguement. So when he says my logic is frail, it is the exact same idea. Therefore, I have the concrete evidence that you do not understand what a fallacy is.

is that what you think a fallacy is? .. better recheck your dictionary dumbass

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/fallacy

al·la·cy (fl-s)
n. pl. fal·la·cies
1. A false notion.
2. A statement or an argument based on a false or invalid inference.
3. Incorrectness of reasoning or belief; erroneousness.
4. The quality of being deceptive.

it has nothing to do with being illogical. moron.

Min

Nov 03, 2005 01:32

I was speaking my opinion, not throwing it around like it was the word the Good God gave us. Calling that a fallacy is like yelling at your kid for not winning the Olympics.

Something else that occured to me: it's a fallacy to shout down someone's argument when you haven't even heard it yet. You can't say that someone's argument is based on "a false or invalid inference" if you don't know what it is.

Nov 03, 2005 01:51

Min wrote:
DANTHEMAN! wrote:
Here we have the concrete evidence which you asked for. A fallacy is an illogical statement or arguement. So when he says my logic is frail, it is the exact same idea. Therefore, I have the concrete evidence that you do not understand what a fallacy is.

is that what you think a fallacy is? .. better recheck your dictionary dumbass

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/fallacy

al·la·cy (fl-s)
n. pl. fal·la·cies
1. A false notion.
2. A statement or an argument based on a false or invalid inference.
3. Incorrectness of reasoning or belief; erroneousness.
4. The quality of being deceptive.

it has nothing to do with being illogical. moron.

Min

There are different definitions. Better go check other sources. Fallacies are subjects of study in universities, and the definition you give here is merely a simpletons definition.

Nov 03, 2005 01:52

Woops, wrong account.

Nov 03, 2005 02:07

Yes, fallacy isn't defined correctly because Min didn't quote a 1,000-page thesis on the subject.

Nov 03, 2005 02:31

Can we all just agree Dtm is dangerously-retarded and lock this off-topic madness?

Nov 03, 2005 02:45

Acro wrote:
Can we all just agree Dtm is dangerously-retarded and lock this off-topic madness?

Locked and Moved to General Chat.

Nov 03, 2005 03:06

nobody is a pimp.

Acro is a non-script junkie.

DTM is a retard.

...Actually, in MM terms, DTM would be a cuntscab.

Last edited: Nov 03, 2005 03:33 (edited 1 time)

Nov 03, 2005 03:32

In Nova terms, "cuntscab" would be italicized.

Nov 03, 2005 03:34

DANTHEMAN! wrote:
In Nova terms, "cuntscab" would be italicized.

In Nova terms, "italicized" would be italicized.

Nov 03, 2005 03:39

Good point there.

Nov 03, 2005 23:30

I must be popular cause people keep using terms :D

Nova is not cool
nobody well hes nobody
acro is 17 yrs old
dtm never shutsup
alian is a goof

terminator