Player Rankings

Feb 28, 2003 03:37 Player Rankings

Its been suggested that new players shouldn't show up in the rankings until they have played atleast a game to rid the default scores from showing. Vote on this to decide if this gets put into place?

For more information see: http://www.winbolo.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=42

Mar 13, 2003 20:59

Anyone else ever going to vote on this? Only seeing the players above the starting point total is somewhat odd. Most of the players that have registered (some 260 now) won't play a 1x1 game, they're just open players for the time being.

Mar 13, 2003 21:46

Sticks wrote:
Anyone else ever going to vote on this? Only seeing the players above the starting point total is somewhat odd. Most of the players that have registered (some 260 now) won't play a 1x1 game, they're just open players for the time being.

Or given that this is a democratic community, I would say that the majority has spoken! Long live the flock and lets get those slackers off the list.

Mar 17, 2003 19:04 A list of all registered players?

I hope this hasn't being answered elsewhere (and if it has, please let me know where - I'm still unfamiliar with this forum thingy), but it'd be nice to see a list of all the players registered. That's why I voted to let those who haven't played a game still be shown on the rankings so I know who else has registered... So, is there a place to see the names of every player registered, including those whose score has fallen below 1600?

-FireIce

Mar 17, 2003 22:06

it'd be nice to see a list of all the players registered.

A list can be found here: http://www.winbolo.net/forums/memberlist.php

Mar 18, 2003 22:28

Guess you should change your vote now that you know of the Memberlist, FireIce.

Mar 19, 2003 22:43

Thanks for the link Elvis. Now I see it is listed on the forum :D. Too bad it doesn't include a direct link to the stats, or a way to list the names by stats from top ranked to lowest ranked...althought that may be a good thing to keep low ranked players from feeling too bad :D

Mar 20, 2003 00:27

ya, I think the member listing is good the way it is. sorted by joindate.

Mar 21, 2003 08:50

Why not sortable column headings? Might as well shoot for the moon!

Mar 21, 2003 08:51

well, if you look at the memberslist ... as elvis pointed out to me ... you can already sort the members list anyway you want it sorted ......... and this feature has been there all along ......... heh

Min

Mar 21, 2003 09:00

Hahaha! We're both talkin out our asses, hey? Guess we need to look at stuff before we make assumptions based on other people's equally uneducated posts....

Mar 21, 2003 09:14

ya, I agree ... I felt like a moron when elvis told me about it ........ hehe

May 12, 2003 20:12

is this planning on getting implemented? ... looks like lots of people want it

Min

May 17, 2003 11:06

The rankings page now only show people who have won or lost one game by default. There is a link at the end of each page which will include people who have not played a game.

May 18, 2003 04:07

One word sums it up: yay!