WinBolo Wish List

Jan 11, 2004 07:50
w00t! I started teaching myself today how to move, shoot, and mine with one hand whilst building/planting/harvesting with the other. (one on the board, one on the mouse). Its kinda a pain in the ass to start with, but im quickly getting used to it. I'm sure it will pay off sometime tho. I hope this will make me a better, more efficient winboloist!
Jan 11, 2004 18:06
How about right-click and drag for scrolling?
Jan 11, 2004 19:50
now, that would be SHWEET!
Jan 11, 2004 20:22
Acro wrote:

The trash talking is unfortunate, but expected. What really amazes me is the amount of people that rush to DEFEND that behavior.


one of the things I hate .. is discrimination .. for any reason, that includes discriminating against people who choose to act different, such as "racists" I was not defending their actions, just their right to act however they like without discrimination.

Min

P.S. right-click scrolling sounds like a good idea, but you'd also have to have the scroll button on the mouse scroll the gunsight .. that way you could keep your hand on the mouse at all times. Interesting idea.
Jan 11, 2004 20:36
btw, smack talk is a long lived bolo tradition. Us oldfolk defend it becuase it is the bolo way .... n'stuff .... you sux rox acro :p

Min
Jan 11, 2004 21:07
Yes, discrimination against discriminators is bad, Min. *sigh* What would also be nice is a third type of "fast" terrain so map-makers can make better designs.
Jan 11, 2004 21:07
[quote="Min

one of the things I hate .. is discrimination .. for any reason, that includes discriminating against people who choose to act different, such as "racists" I was not defending their actions, just their right to act however they like without discrimination.

[/quote]


You're attempting to seperate the 'action' from the individual. This is how the 'insanity' defense got started. This is kinda scary. Make sure you don't say anything that might discriminate against the guy who is knifing you in the gut......Make sure you don't discriminate against the pedophile as your kids are being attacked. 'Excuse me sir, I don't agree with what your're doing, but I don't want to offend you.' I WILL discriminate against anyone who supports torture, genocide, and heinous acts. I'd run them out of town if I had the say-so. Count on it. Wars have started because people didn't want to put a lid on atrocities. Anyone who verbally supports atrocities will likely practice them if given the chance. These people are filling up our jails.

Is this 'smack-talk' good for bolo? No. Is it helpful in any shape or form? No. Is anyone justified using it at any time? No. It's destructive. It makes me sick. Nothing you can say in defense of it is going to make any sense because IT doesn't make any sense.
Jan 11, 2004 21:38
Like us going into Iraq. It was the right thing to do. Now all we have to do is tell the Sunni's, straighten up or else we'll divide Iraq into 3 separate countries. the Shite's get the oil and the south, the kurds the oil and the north, the sunni's... well you get the sand and the middle.
Jan 11, 2004 22:34
Acro wrote:

You're attempting to seperate the 'action' from the individual. This is how the 'insanity' defense got started. This is kinda scary. Make sure you don't say anything that might discriminate against the guy who is knifing you in the gut......Make sure you don't discriminate against the pedophile as your kids are being attacked. 'Excuse me sir, I don't agree with what your're doing, but I don't want to offend you.' I WILL discriminate against anyone who supports torture, genocide, and heinous acts. I'd run them out of town if I had the say-so. Count on it. Wars have started because people didn't want to put a lid on atrocities. Anyone who verbally supports atrocities will likely practice them if given the chance. These people are filling up our jails.


explain to me how what I said ment I condone illegal activities in anyway? stabbing someone is illegal, having sex with children is illegal, racism is not, protesting the existence of people who are different is not illegal, I don't agree with it, but I also don't discriminate them for that difference, I don't treat people differently becuase they are a racist, or a black person, or a purple polkadotted person. or becuase they have different beliefs. You on the otherhand have made it perfectly clear that you don't discriminate against people for being different colors (racism)... but you do discriminate against people who have a different system of beliefs than you ....... I see parrallels between those 2 ........

Acro wrote:

Is this 'smack-talk' good for bolo? No. Is it helpful in any shape or form? No. Is anyone justified using it at any time? No. It's destructive. It makes me sick. Nothing you can say in defense of it is going to make any sense because IT doesn't make any sense.


there is nothing wrong with a bit of smacktalk between friends, I don't however think that its right to smacktalk/trashtalk someone who is easily offended by that sort of thing, or someone who isn't your friend, I agree that sort of behavior is destructive, but as I said, there is no problem with friends smacktalking friends. However, that sort of thing should not spill out into a place were it could be viewed for years to come ... such as this forum. but its nice to know you have such a weak stomach ...... the trashtalk that occur's in #winbolo is unacceptable in my opinion.

Min
Jan 11, 2004 22:39
hehe, funny shit.
Jan 11, 2004 22:49
It should already be clear that I discriminate against people whose beliefs are wrong and destructive, not people with beliefs that differ from mine just for the sake of there being a difference. You did a little *twisty* with my words. And I may not have said you condone illegal activity, but I get the sense you wouldn't do much to block it, if given the chance; for fear of not being politically correct.

So you do agree the trashtalk in winbolo is unacceptable. That was my main point, as well. And yes, MM, this is a good flame. :D

Is having a strong stomach a requirement for being here? Is it recommended, or helpful? Then something's very wrong.
Jan 11, 2004 22:58
Acro wrote:
It should already be clear that I discriminate against people whose beliefs are wrong and destructive, not people with beliefs that differ from mine just for the sake of there being a difference. You did a little *twisty* with my words. And I may not have said you condone illegal activity, but I get the sense you wouldn't do much to block it, if given the chance; for fear of not being politically correct.


who are you to decide what other peoples beliefs are wrong? .. or destructive? ....

you did a little *twisty* of my words as well ...paybacks a bitch

you have no idea anything about me ........ what does being politically correct have to do with anything? .... I'm refering to treating people with a basic amount of respect no matter what their beliefs are, they have just as much right to be here breathing your air as you do .... (now restrain yourself from assuming this means anything more than what it states .. such as I condone genecide or something equally insane.)

Min
Jan 11, 2004 23:07
Acro wrote:
I WILL discriminate against anyone who supports torture, genocide, and heinous acts.


uh.... ya.... you can discriminate against anyone you like, My whole point is that I don't, and I have a certain view of that behavior in others .. such as yourself .... its not my place to tell you how to act or feel about certain things, but I will defend my friends when they've done nothing "wrong" .. just something "offensive" .... your simply taking this too far .... and exaggerating badly ....

Acro wrote:
I'd run them out of town if I had the say-so. Count on it. Wars have started because people didn't want to put a lid on atrocities. Anyone who verbally supports atrocities will likely practice them if given the chance. These people are filling up our jails.


Then I'm very glad you don't have a say so ...... very very very glad ..... its this thing calle freedom of belief .... belief has nothing to do with action ... saying "will likely practice them" is making assumptions in a huge sweeping way ..... "oh no, there is muslims in town who support terrorism ... even though they arn't fanatics and will never do anything on their own ... lets run their ass's outta town! evil tax payers! evil humans!! lets burn down their houses and lynch them in tree's too and their kids too!!! cause they will 'likely' take on their parents belief system!!!......." sounds pretty stupid to me .... but thats what your arguement is saying to me. With a bit of exaggeration in there for effect.

Min

PS. I returned to that post after reading the last few lines more carefully ....
Jan 11, 2004 23:37
Wow, there's alot of anger there, min. Calm down. It's ok. Gotcha kinda hot and bothered eh, heh. My original beef was with SJ's troubling posts, not anything written by you.

You don't need to look to me to decide what things are wrong or destructive, look to laws. Look to history. And look to conscience, and a sense of right and wrong, if you possess these things.

As for 'will likely practice', numerous studies have shown that children with behavioral issues are FAR more likely to become criminals because they were never shown restraint, right and wrong, or given the necessary nurturing in youth to be part of society.

Defend your friends? Sure. Anyone would.

If there are muslims in town that support terrorism and the gov't found out about it, they WOULD be deported!!! What rock have you been under? And 'who are you' to predict these people won't take action? Nah, you never heard of 'sleeper cells' I guess.

You still can't make the connection that something 'offensive' IS something done wrong.

Fact: Saying 'Go die in the ovens Jew' is WRONG. (unless this is a parallel evil reality) You cannot dispute this and retain credibility.

Fact: If you're friend says something hurtful and offensive, you are WRONG to defend it. Loyalty to friends can sometimes be blinding.

'I'm referring to treating people with a basic amount of respect'. Uh, min, is 'Go die in the ovens Jew' treating people with a basic amount of respect? Keep in mind this post was aimed AT a Jew. You're still WRONG to defend SJ on this issue, any way you slice it.
Jan 11, 2004 23:50
I hate to see this end; its a great debate. But it takes up web space and changes the minds of no one. I'll still read your reply, min. You can have the last word. :D :D :D
Jan 11, 2004 23:54
mmmm, beef.
Jan 12, 2004 00:20
uh, again acro, I was refering to what 'I' do not what others do... in reference to the basic amount of respect ....

Defending SJ is not a "right" or "wrong" issue, so I can't possibly be "wrong" to defend him .... and you have no right to suggest I am. Defending him is a matter of friendship, and admiration for the good things he's doing for this community. Which you seem to lack the ability to recognize ... or sorry ... the "wrong" things he's done outweight the good.

you don't really know SJ very well, he tends to say things to see the amusing response it gets, is it "wrong" to say it and watch people yell and scream about it while laughing your ass off? ... sure ... does this forum have any policies stating that sort of behavior is unacceptable? ... no ... what I first suggested in the first post I made is .... how do you kill a tree? ... you chop off its roots .... the reasons there is posts like this is becuase no policy that says saying racist remarks are bad and will be deleted, if there was ... we would kill the roots of this problem, and it would go away.

I will refrain from commenting on the rest of your post for the exact reasons you stated, noone's opinion will be changed anyways. Twas fun though, a good discussion makes the fingers warm.

Min

p.s. I'm very very rarely angry when I reply to posts, if I'm actually mad or angry about something, I tend to say nothing instead.
Jan 12, 2004 05:50
wonka wrote:
Like us going into Iraq. It was the right thing to do.

Whether it was right or wrong depends on who you ask, but the way to get us into Iraq was not.
Last edited: Jan 13, 2004 01:54 (edited 1 time)
Jan 12, 2004 05:58
Knight_who_Sux_Ass wrote:
Q-mandabomb wrote:
perhaps an lgm sniping mode! lgms come from all sides and you stand in the center and see how well you fare...also ...ive been wanting to say this for a while:




perhaps it could be integrated to joust mode:




the more and more tank kills/pills u take ect you get some "WBN POINTS" with em you can go to our "store" and buy new bullets, faster tire treads, and other cool stuff. note this would ONLY BE IN "DUEL MODE"....and if you register you should get points or soemthing too, to get ppl to register more.....if these features appeared i would DEFINITELY register to it n pay.


If we did this winbolo, it wouldn't be winbolo any longer.

It would be something like this, www.neopets.com


Now, if we were to do something like that, it would make the bad players able toe beat players like Zach and Sev and Ud. If we were to do this it should only change the look of your tank. Such as design, shape, color. not the attributes.



-ren

renbot.winbolo.us


very insightful ren and i completely agree....but:

train tracks suxor we need tank treads showing up on the ground and lgm splatter marks


...is the first thing that Suicide Jockey has ever said that could be good for the winbolo community


Thanks, Knight, for turning my nice little discussion into a 5-page flamewar. *sigh*
Jan 12, 2004 06:00
Sticks wrote:
wonka wrote:
Like us going into Iraq. It was the right thing to do.

Whether it was right or wrong depends on who you ask, but the way to get us into Iraq was not.


Just another case of conservative rights belief that the ends justify the means, however horrible or untruthful they may be
Jan 12, 2004 06:36
Ya he did do a good job eh Nova? had Acro being all discriminatory to me because I'm white and Christian and Min sticking up for me cuz he's my friend and white also
Jan 13, 2004 00:17
What would be nice if people could quote whatever offended them, start their own thread and flame away. That way, people who want to read flames and join in flames can do that, and those who'd just want actual content (well, better content than any flamewar) can look at the flame-less posts.
Feb 17, 2004 03:21
I had another idea for WinBolo just the other day. This would make setting up games somewhat easier. Before the start, everyone would select a starting position from a list of choices. Then everyone would click on a “ready” button. There’d be a 5-second countdown on everyone’s screens and then a Go! sign. Just before the Go! the whole map would be reset to its original configuration which means that players could fool around on the map beforehand or, if it’s a new map, the players could drive around and get a feel for the map.

Perhaps for 1x1s you could choose for a starting position “random but separate starting locations.”

--Nova
Feb 17, 2004 15:03
and someting that takes stats from a player and makes teams would be neat....but first wed need seomthing to link accounts.......
Feb 19, 2004 17:58 A Wish from Lynk
Hey everybody!
GO TO H***!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But, a wish for you all!
For those who cuss: Someone steals their computers.
For those who don't: That someone gives away the computers to you.
Now... YOU'LL HATE ME MORE! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
Yah yah yah. Whatever. You wanna piece of me? Too bad. I glued myself toghether just yesterday.
(bad joke...)
« Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Page 3 of 4 (76 posts total)