With all this in mind, do you think lrl should be banned for hacking in the tournament? if i am banned for hacking in a game with no meaingin whatsoever, just a game.. should lrl be banned for hacking in the tournament.
dont be affraid to say something after you vote... who ever voted second.
fuck ya, he HACKED, the ultimate sin. Q-man hacked alot also, so he should be ban'd.
mm id be quiet and stop trying to backstab ppl becuz u got in shit.
Q-mandabomb if I was you I would stfu and quit trying to throw my 2 cents in when I don't know shit about anything except being a moron.
Until zach steps up and says "LRL was hacking!" there's no real proof that he hacked in the game. Now, I don't know zach personally but I imagine that he'd be screaming bloody murder if LRL hacked that game. Correct me if I'm wrong---did he ever do that?
The reason I stopped playing 1.08 was becuase of the advent of hacking ... and the inability to tell if anyone is cheating at anytime ... it breeds this mistrust .. and a realm of mistrust. Alot of accusations start getting thrown around. Instead of the game being fun, it turns into a flaming pit of retardedness. After 1.08, certain antihacking mechinism's were implemented that prevented certain forms of hacking. After awhile, it was discovered that hacking was still there, and could be done readily. This is one of the many reasons that I don't play very much winbolo right now, if a person uses their brain, they could easily hack without anyone knowing any better. A client hook that allows someone to refuel faster, or get armor, or even regenerate armor slowly overtime even though your not on a base (I'm sure it could be done) Would be very difficult for someone to detect. How would you know that your opponent was able to refuel on that base 4-5 seconds faster than they should have been able to normally. This of course doesn't seem like a problem to most people. but when your skill is so close to another persons that a single lgm kill, or a single misclick can be the difference between a defeat or a victory. It becomes a major problem in my opinion. The first thing people need to start doing is stopping the accusations, all it does is breed hatred, secondly, .us's policies (as flawed as they are) need to apply to everyone, including fi, lrl, sheeps, and UD ... they should be banned just like everyone else, for a length of time just like anyone else ... thats what you moron's would have wanted when I was controlling things ... hows it feel now that your wearing my shoes?.
Min
Aye Minhiriath, FAR too many accusations. For example, i hacked a few times on ren's server (q-man hacked waaaaay more than me, and others hacked also), and then ren starts accusing me of hacking on every fucking server ever. Sure, i did it twice on sheepbot also (i quit permanatly soon afterwards). But now i am ban'd from pawnybot for NO FUCKING REASON AT ALL. I have NEVER hacked on pawnybot, not once. And thanks to ren's slanderous bullshit and accusations, i am ban'd from using pawnybot. What does anyone gain from this? NOTHING. Except maybe a few ppl (looks at ren) who might derive some sick, twisted pleasure from keeping ppl from playing winbolo, the shweetisht game.
I also agree that the policy should apply to EVERYONE EQUALLY, no matter who they are (Dz, or LRL). I have seen ppl violate the policy without so much as a kick, then i have seen some ppl just walk into the channel and be banned without reason. Some of the shit your saying min is finally making sense and i see why you don't bother IRC-ing anymore and don't play the game as much.
-Madd Maxx-
Pawn, ren and sheeps have the right to ban whoever they wish, whenever they wish. Stop bitching.
yes Nova is another pawn of the .us crew, your quickly catching onto this concept maxx.
looks like i was wrong. after checking both fi's site and .us it clearly states no hacking at all. so, i'm not forsure why lrl didn't get banned. maybe that rule wasn't implemented until after.
ok here is the link
http://www.winbolo.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=886